Harvey Goldsmith: Led Zeppelin Tour Is Pointless Without Robert Plant

He dismisses getting a new singer...

October 28, 2008 by Scott Colothan

Previous Next

7 of 15

Previous Next

2 3 4 5 678 9 10 11

(6)

I dont see why the three of them wouldnt want to tour without Plant. He is too country anyways ISH! Europe got to see the reunion, why not the rest of us have out chance? I would go in a heartbeat! I was too young when they were together but have been a huge fan for over 30 years! I say find another singer and who cares if they call themselves something other than Zep, whats a name. Bring it on boys!!!!! The world awaits history!
~ by deb 10/28/2008 Report
Whoever said they would call their new band Led Zeppelin?
~ by Steve Sauer 10/28/2008 Report
Harvey Goldsmith is entitled to his opinon - god knows we have all paid enough for him to form it! If he does not want to promote the band he should get along and say so. Jimmy, John and Jason have every right to take the tour to the masses with the songs back in the key that they were originally written. Robert won't mind - he is busy!
~ by Art Bennett 10/28/2008 Report
deb What do mean the three of them? Plant is one of the three of them. If Plant isn't there the resulting band would only contain 2 of the original members of LZ. What's the point of that? Shouldn't such a band be called 'Page Jones' in the same way that there previously was a 'Plant Page' tour.
~ by harpo 10/28/2008 Report
DEB, if you think going out on tour without plant is a good idea then I pity you when you say you are a Led Zep fan. I too have never seen Zep due to my age, but I really really hope they never reform without Plant, it would be a nail in the coffin for the greatest band of all time. If they went out as another name and made an album themselves then fair enough, but lets face it, that aint going to happen due to what the brand of Zep can bring about in terms of £
~ by nevergoback 10/29/2008 Report