Hot right now:

    YouTube Imposes Ban On Music Videos

    In the UK...

    March 10, 2009 by Jason Gregory

    YouTube has restricted access to music videos in the UK after failing to reach a new licensing deal with the Performing Rights Society for Music.

    The video-sharing website began making thousands of videos unavailable to users from last evening (March 9th).

    The Google-owned company claim PRS's proposed plans to raise licensing fees are prohibitive and would cost the company more than it earns from the adverts that appear next to each video.

    YouTube also said PRS had refused to specify which artists would be covered by which licence.

    Steve Porter, head of the PRS, told the BBC he was "outraged... shocked and disappointed" by YouTube's decision, which he claimed had been taken “without any consultation”.

    Patrick Walker, YouTube's director of video partnerships, said the move was "regrettable"- but argued that it was necessary to encourage more discussion.

    "We feel we are so far apart that we have to remove content while we continue to negotiate with the PRS,” he said.

    "We are making the message public because it will be noticeable to users on the site."

    The breakdown in talks will come as a blow to both companies as music videos are among some of the most popular content on YouTube.

    YouTube's decision will see videos from artists signed to the four major record labels - EMI, Universal, Warner Music and Sony BMG – and some independent labels vanish from the website.

    Who do you think is right – YouTube or PRS? Leave your thoughts by filling out the comment form below.

    You can keep up to date with all the latest news from Gigwise by following us on Twitter and liking us on Facebook.


    (3)
    • It's never that clear cut. The PRS are trying to protect revenue for the artists. youtube are trying to maximise return and minimise their costs (like any business). The record companies and the PRS need to get into the real world. Times aren't like before and they will cut off their nose. We the viewers also need to realise that content isn't made for free. There has to be some form of payment be in advertising or £

      ~ by goodgrr 3/10/2009 Report

      Reply to this comment

    • PRS are ridiclous...! Youtube also blocked artists who are british and that produce music out of order

      ~ by jmicaallef 3/11/2009 Report

      Reply to this comment

    • The PRS are NOT trying to protect revenue for artists - the PRS is trying to increae its own revenue. However, I have wondered how much of the ad revenue that record companies are taking from "This video contains (i.e.) Sony content" videos which display ads, actually winds up in the hands of artists. This is tricky, but I have to say YouTube ARE working with the rights holders, the PRS are trying to do what they always do, make money for doing nothing.

      ~ by Rob Scott 3/13/2009 Report

      Reply to this comment


    Artist A-Z   # A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z